Back to article list
PoliticsVerifiedKorea

Korea

Korean originalTranslated

Prime Minister Han Sung-sook calls for clarity on powers to appoint Supreme Court justices

Prime Minister Han Sung-sook said on the 7th that legal experts need to clarify the scope of appointment powers amid a dispute between the presidential office and the Supreme Court over resubmitting nominations for Supreme Court justices.

Prime Minister Han Seong-suk speaks while holding a microphone and raising one hand.
Prime Minister Han Seong-suk speaks at a luncheon with the press corps at the prime minister’s official residence in Sejong on the afternoon of October 7, 2026.

Prime Minister Han Sung-sook said on the 7th that the scope of appointment powers should be clarified amid a dispute between the presidential office and the Supreme Court over resubmitting nominations for Supreme Court justices. She said legal experts need to establish how far those powers extend.

Speaking at a press gathering at the prime minister's official residence in Sejong, Han said nomination and appointment powers had been exercised through customary practice without clear definitions. She added that there would be no problem if the two powers were clearly defined in law and institutional rules.

Han questioned whether the president could be said to have appointment powers if the chief justice holds nomination powers and the president must accept nominations as submitted. She also said she had not heard an answer to that question.

She also raised the appointing authority's power to reject a nomination. Han asked how the process would differ from the chief justice making the appointment directly if nominations could not be rejected, and whether the prime minister's nomination powers should have a different name if they differ from those of the chief justice.

Han said she believed it was time to clarify the definitions of nomination and appointment powers. She added that clarifying the two powers could help keep the dispute from becoming a prolonged war of attrition.

Connected coverage

Related stories in one view

Continue in chronological order.

Politics ·

Democratic Party criticizes Cho's nomination refusal, signals leadership talks on impeachment

Lawmakers from the Democratic Party of Korea, Rebuilding Korea Party and Progressive Party on the National Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee criticized Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae on the 22nd for refusing a request to nominate a Supreme Court justice again. The Democratic Party side said it intended to discuss with the party leadership whether to pursue impeachment.

Lawmakers presenting their position at a podium in the National Assembly's Communication Hall, with a sign language interpreter
Seo Young-kyo, chair of the National Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee, and Democratic Party lawmakers present a joint position on Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae's refusal to renominate a Supreme Court justice candidate at the National Assembly's Communication Hall on the 22nd.

Lawmakers from the Democratic Party of Korea, Rebuilding Korea Party and Progressive Party on the National Assembly's Legislation and Judiciary Committee criticized Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae on the 22nd for refusing a request to nominate a Supreme Court justice again. They called it a political act violating the judiciary's duty of political neutrality, while the Democratic Party side said it intended to discuss with party leaders whether to pursue impeachment.

The lawmakers cited Article 104(2) of the Constitution, which provides for nomination by the chief justice, parliamentary consent and appointment by the president. They argued that requesting a new nominee was a legitimate exercise of presidential appointment power, rebutting Cho's position that there were no constitutional grounds or reasons to justify it.

The Democratic Party requested that Cho appear as a witness at the judiciary committee's parliamentary audit in October. The lawmakers also said they intended to establish the facts of the matter during the audit.

Community discussion

View board →

Loading discussions…

Open story permalink ↗